Police in Louisiana say a Mississippi man claimed to be a “sovereign citizen” who’s immune from arrest during a traffic stop.
Slidell officers on Friday charged 54-year-old James Doyle Webb of Bay St. Louis with several violations, including not having a driver’s license, a license plate or insurance. He was also charged with resisting an officer.
It was not immediately clear Saturday whether Webb is represented by an attorney.
A news release from the Slidell Police Department says Webb requested the names and badge numbers of officers who stopped him, then would not produce documents officers requested after he wrote down their information. The release says he was arrested after officers thought he was reaching for a gun.
Instead of a license, he had a homemade “Constitutional Protection Travel Identification.”
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
Another nut case
Maybe he is not as crazy as you think. There are things in law that give us many more rights and protections than our leaders don’t want to recognize. They would have much less control over the people if they did.
He’s a distant cousin of Hillary Clinton and he thinks that he’s above the law.
LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!!!!!
Another wonderful liberal that thinks he is above the law and rules only apply to others.
I think there might be a little more to the story. Is the guy crazy? Most serenely. I can see how people might believe they are above the law, as do our government leaders and rich people. Oh, We can’t forget our unwelcome guests that have come into our nation by braking the law. Sense they broke the law to get here, NO laws apply to them. They can lie, cheat, still, rape pillage and plunder. Deal drugs, run chop shops, prostitution, human trafficking, MURDER!! It’s all good. If you are here illegally, in politics, or rich, laws don’t apply.
He was half right his is a citizen of a govern nation no matter which nation that might be but unless he has diplomatic immunity he must obey all our laws on and off the hwy !!! And even with the immunity he still can be ticketed just not put in jail !! So either way he was in the wrong !!! This group of nonconformest think each state does not have the power to make any laws that might infringe on their freedom to do as they please like poaching , moonshine making. And driving cars & trucks with out paying the taxes that are intended to maintain the roads they drive on !!!!
permission to break the law.
License
The permission granted by competent authority to exercise a certain privilege that, without such authorization, would constitute an illegal act,
The supreme court ruled in Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618 (1969), was a Supreme Court decision that helped to establish a fundamental “right to travel” in U.S. law.
Although the Constitution does not mention the right to travel, it is implied by the other rights given in the Constitution.
The state can not take a right of the people and charge a fee and require a license..
The sham foreign British law society
n 1950, the 81st Congress investigated the Lawyers Guild and determined that the B.A.R. Association is founded and run by communists under definition. Thus, any elected official that is a member of the B.A.R. will only be loyal to the B.A.R. and not the people.
Black’s Law Dictionaries 4th, 3rd, 2nd and 1st: “Lawyers: A person learned in the law as an attorney, counsel, or solicitor, a person licensed to practice law, any person for who for fee or reward, prosecutes or defends, causes in courts of record, or other judicial tribunal, of the United States, or of any other State, or whose business it is to give legal advice, in relation to any case or matter, whatsoever.” (Act of July 13, 1866 – Section 9, 14 Statutes at Large 121)
The B.A.R. Association has no Legislative Authority to have been created. They’re a private corporation. The Attorners are self appointed! They gave themselves their authority, and they’re using fraudulent Statutes which does not apply to “We the people”. They just came in, took over, and they’re taking full advantage of the fact that no one will dig and read their real history.
THERE IS NO SUCH STATUTE IN THE STATUTES AT LARGE!!! THE B.A.R. IS A PRIVATE INDUSTRY, A PRIVATE ASSOCIATION. They’re trying to make everyone believe they have Congressional Authority, that they simply do not have.
Where in the Statutes at Large were Lawyers, most especially Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, ever given the authority to practice law in the courtroom? There isn’t even Legislative Authority for the International B.A.R., or the American B.A.R., the British Accreditation Registry, to be created, much less, authority to work in the courts, and to monopolize the courts. They’re a private corporation, and they issue their own union cards, which they deceptively call “Licenses.” Imagine a private Carpenter’s Union issuing their own licenses. This type of monopoly is against the Taft-Hartley Act, The Clayton Trust Act, the Sherman Antitrust Act, and the Smith Act. They’re a SELF-APPOINTED monopoly. These are foreign Agents registered under F.A.R.A.
As the years passed, these foreign Agents managed to get themselves unlawfully into Offices of Trust (poliical offices) so they could shape statutes and codes to suit their agenda, rendering all their unconstitutionally created garbage, null and void, nunc pro tunc.
Article XIII put the teeth into this:
Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: “No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.”
Article XIII “If any citizen of the United States shall Accept, claim, receive or retain any title of nobility or honour, or shall, without the consent of Congress, accept and retain any present, pension, office or emolument of any kind whatever, from any emperor, king, prince or foreign power, such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States (COMMENT – vs US Citizen…a different thing), and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.”
Do you have an understanding of what is meant when the original Article XIII says, “such person shall cease to be a citizen of the United States, and shall be incapable of holding any office of trust or profit under them, or either of them.” Does it mean federal citizen of the United States only when it says, “under them, or either of them.” Doesn’t that mean federal (corporation) United States and also unincorporated United States?
So as anyone can read, especially the fraudsters who claim to have gone to law school, THEY’RE NOT ALLOWED TO DO ANY OF THE THINGS THEY DO! In 1871, the B.A.R. Attorners/Brokers for the Crown–Swiss Banksters created a Military Coup on D.C., setting up the Bankster’s seizure of all commerce. They’re foreclosed from partity with the living, so they created “U.S. citizenship”, so all U.S. citizens would be in contract with the Crown, as DEBTORS for the artificial BANKRUPTCY.
A lawyer is some one who studies law. An attorney is someone who holds the profession of attornment, the taking of property, people and goods for it’s owner/master.
Under the Attorney General Manual, while under Martial Law Rule, section 3.2 – 110, History, all one needs is to be “learned in the law”, not Color of Law.
you naysayers would do well to read a little more. our government (not just obama) has usurped our freedoms by simply labeling their self-serving acts as “laws”. how’s this for a “law”: I hereby declare and legislate a new car, new house, and free dinner at longhorn’s every day. NOW, if one of you “fine”, “upstanding” representatives of the people will just “add” that “law” to the books, I’ll be on my way.