by Aimee Pontier, Editor
Last night Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders proved his campaign isn’t over — not by a long shot.
And Sanders still appears to have a path to the Democratic nomination — or at least the ability to force a contested convention.
With Sanders latest win in West Virginia Tuesday night, he now has 1,430 of pledged delegates compared to Clinton’s 1,716.
Clinton’s campaign is crossing its fingers that Sanders’ supporters have given up faith and won’t go to the polls in the upcoming primaries, handing her the nomination.
But speaking in Atlantic City, NJ, on Monday, Sanders urged supporters to deny any discussion that his chance at winning the election is over.
“We have now won over 45 percent of the pledged delegates,” Sanders said. “If we can win here in New Jersey and win in California and win in some of the other states, and if we can win a majority of the pledged delegates, we’re going to go into Philadelphia and the Democratic convention and expect to come out with the Democratic nomination. So don’t let – don’t let anybody tell you this campaign is over. We’re gonna fight for the last vote we can find in New Jersey and California.”
June 7th is potentially a major turning point for the Sanders campaign, with California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota and South Dakota heading to the polls. Sanders has been busy campaigning in California, the nation’s most delegate-rich state, with 475 pledged delegates up for grabs.
If Sanders can prevent Clinton from getting the remaining 667 pledged delegates that she needs to reach the magic number of 2,383 to clinch the nomination — a realistic possibility considering Clinton is required to now win 80 percent of the vote in the remaining states — the two will head to a contested convention, where the superdelegates will decide.
Clinton’s cushion of 523 superdelegates is substantial, but not a single one has yet voted. Considering they’re open to changing their vote up to the last minute, the party’s nomination will remain up for grabs at the convention.
That gives Sanders time to add to his miniscule total of 39 superdelegates and become the Democratic nominee.
Clinton is no stranger to losing superdelegates. In 2008, 120 superdelegates switched their loyalty from Clinton to Obama.
But why Sanders?
Some political analysts say it’s reasonable to imagine superdelegates being swayed to “Feel the Bern” for the sake of the party. Numerous polls have illustrated Clinton’s weakness in the general election, and show Sanders has a far better chance than Clinton of beating the presumed Republican nominee Donald Trump in November.
Clinton’s inability to put away Sanders in the primaries isn’t just costing her good graces within the Democratic establishment. It is costing her gravely in the general election — and has the Trump campaign licking their chops.
“This is not Bill Clinton’s Democratic Party,” Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway said in a recent apperance on MSNBC’s “Hardball” with Chris Matthews. “That’s obvious. The centrist, moderate, southern governor, Democratic governor, who are those? Where are the Blue Dog Democrats?”
Matthews then asked Conway if she was happy about the Democratic primary situation.
“I’m thrilled because Hillary Clinton is trying to wage right now, quite unsuccessfully, a two-front war,” Conway replied. “Bernie’s to her left so she’s moving over there when she can. Donald Trump has vanquished 16 opponents, she can’t vanquish one. So I think he could pivot to a general election and take her on in the next 90 days.”
If that isn’t enough to convince superdelegates to support Bernie Sanders, a possible indictment of Clinton could have them rushing to back the Vermont Democrat.
In the coming weeks, Clinton is set to be interviewed by the FBI, signaling the months’ long investigation into her handling of classified emails is coming to an end — and an indictment may soon follow.
Former U.S. attorney Joe DiGenova told radio host Laura Ingraham that he believes a Clinton indictment is imminent, saying if she isn’t indicted, the Justice Department will never be able to charge another federal employee with similar crimes.
“The intelligence community will not stand for that. They will fight for indictment and they are already in the process of gearing themselves to basically revolt if [Attorney General Loretta Lynch] refuses to bring charges” he said.
If DiGenova is right and Clinton faces a criminal indictment, her entire campaign will be derailed and the Democratic Party could be forced to put someone else, most likely Sanders, on the ticket.
If one of her aids or advisers faces chargers, superdelegates will still be turned off from pledging their allegiance to a candidate encircled in scandal.
The Clinton campaign is increasingly desperate for voters to forget Sanders — but last night’s results in West Virginia prove they have not.
And it could ultimately cost Clinton the White House.
Aimee Pontier is an Editor for The Horn News
Wow! What a dilemma. Whether to choose a Socialist Commie or a murdering, lying, lowlife. I surmise that the one chosen on the Demrat side will be the one that sends a thrill up Chris Matthews leg, lol.
Better vote for Trump and do something great for America!
Dawg#
You got it completely right – it’s so unbelievable it’s pathetic, but good for our side.
Lol, don’t know,,,,,, But Obama did, so Chris has stated on National tv.
Right on Dawg#!!
Dawg# I voted Donald Trump in the Mexizona(Arizona) primary. Donal Trump is the best choice we
have, then the Libertarian Party Candadate Gary Johnson is the next best choice to vote for in November.
It’s a ROTTON shame that the damned media won’t give the Libertarians, the Greens and Independents
Equal coverage. The Philippines has five major parties and all get equal coverage. TRUMP 2016.
Is it any surprise that West Virginia would dump Hillary and go with Bernie after she promised to shut down their leading industry and put everyone out of work. The rippling effects of that would bankrupt the State. But Bernie would not really be any better. They have their difference but the end results would be much the same. A votet for either of them is a vote for unemployment and higher taxes.
Burntout Slanders is quite optimistic with his “if i win this state and that state then another state plus those states” reminds me of the guy that says “if we had some ham, we could have ham sandwiches, if we had some bread”. Hitlary will be fun to watch if she looses again. Wonder what job Burntout will offer her like “O” did.
The guy is 74, Average lifetime 82, Google gives him I believe 11 years. How much of that will be dementia, If not already starting
He is 74 years old, Life expectancy is 82, Google gives him I believe 11 years. Then how much of that will be dementia if not already starting
74, a socialist who has never had a real job, only worked registering people for Food Stamps, at 40 years of age. Seriously, that was his first job. He tried carpentry, but couldn’t do that, either. Got married, but she split. All he’s ever done, as far as I can find, is complain that the rich had it so easy.What he wants to do is raise taxes. Your typical liberal…take other peoples’ money, rather than earn your own money. And yet, the gullible fall for this line.
Of course, I suppose that’s better than what Hillary and Bubba do: they just kill anyone who gets in their way, and steal their money.
How about all the money republican Trump earned off all those illegal laborers?
The choices are not good for the Democrat party. Hillary has a track record of incompetence and corruption. Bernie became a Democrat because his chances were better than running in the socialist party; in a normal year he would have become irrelevant a long time ago. Maybe the super delegates need to talk with Hillary and tell her that a large percentage of Democrats can’t stand her. Perhaps its time to find a sane, mainstream Democrat and make them the party’s nominee.
If Donald can unite the Republican party and begin to act like a leader rather than a school yard bully then this could be a good year for the Republican party.