The Horn News

Proudly American, Fiercely Independent

Get in the loop!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Privacy Policy

One moment, please:

Processing your submission

  • Home
  • Politics
  • National News
  • Money
  • International
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • America Unleashed

Secret rooms discovered in Egyptian pyramid

March 17, 2016 By: Stephen Dietrich

  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • Post

Scans of King Tut’s burial chamber have revealed two hidden rooms, Egypt’s antiquities minister said Thursday — a discovery that could intensify speculation that the chambers contain the remains of the famed Queen Nefertiti.

Mamdouh el-Damaty told reporters that the secret chambers may contain metal or organic material, but he declined to comment on whether royal treasure or mummies could be inside. Analysis of the scans made by a Japanese team showed chambers that would be scanned again at the end of the month to get a better idea of what may lay inside, he said.

“It means a rediscovery of Tutankhamun … for Egypt it is a very big discovery, it could be the discovery of the century,” el-Damaty said. “It is very important for Egyptian history and for all of the world.”

Egypt's Antiquities Minister Mamdouh el-Damaty, left, speaks during a press conference as he displays images of radar scans to King Tut's burial chamber on a projector, at the antiquities ministry in Cairo, Egypt, Thursday, March 17, 2016. El-Damaty says analysis of scans of famed King Tut's burial chamber has revealed two hidden rooms that could contain metal or organic material. (AP Photo/Amr Nabil)

(AP Photo/Amr Nabil)

The discovery could shine new light on one of ancient Egypt’s most turbulent times, and one prominent researcher has theorized that the Nefertiti’s remains could be inside. British Egyptologist Nicholas Reeves speculates that Tutankhamun, who died at the age of 19, may have been rushed into an outer chamber of what was originally Nefertiti’s tomb, which archeologists have yet to find.

Famed for her beauty, Nefertiti was the subject of a famous 3,300-year-old bust. Nefertiti was one of the wives of Tutankhamun’s father, the Pharaoh Akhenaten.

El-Damaty said it was too early to tell what the metal and organic material could be, saying only that he thinks the new chambers could contain the tomb of a member of Tutankhamun’s family.

The tomb lies in Luxor, in southern Egypt, which served as the pharaonic capital in ancient times, and is home to sprawling temples and several highly decorated ancient tombs in the Valley of the Kings.

Reeves reached his theory after high-resolution images discovered what he said were straight lines in King Tut’s tomb. These lines, previously hidden by color and the stones’ texture, indicate the presence of a sealed chamber, he said. The images were broadcast live on national television last September.

At the Cairo news conference, el-Damaty highlighted radar scans that showed anomalies in the walls of the tomb, indicating a possible hidden door and the chambers, which lay behind walls that were covered up and painted over with hieroglyphics.

Nefertiti was the primary wife of the Pharaoh Akhenaten, who unsuccessfully attempted to switch Egypt to an early form of monotheism. Akhenaten was succeeded by a pharaoh referred to as Smenkhare and then Tut, who was proven by genetic testing to have been Akhenaten’s son.

Tut, Nefertiti, and Akhenaten’s family ruled Egypt during one of its most turbulent times, which ended with a military takeover by Egypt’s top general at the time, Horemheb. The family’s names were later erased from official records.

The Associated Press contributed to this article. 

About the Author

Stephen Dietrich

Stephen is a U.S. Army veteran with over a decade of combined experience in political commentary, economics, and news.

Comments

  1. Stanley Goodrich says

    March 17, 2016 at 10:48 am

    Carter discovered King Tut’s tomb much earlier than the 1992 date noted in the article above.

    • DAR American says

      March 17, 2016 at 11:59 am

      Yes, it was discovered in 1922. Seventy years before the article states.

      • Albert Friday says

        March 19, 2016 at 4:31 am

        Could it have been a typo: 1992 rather than 1922?

    • Ed says

      March 18, 2016 at 9:05 pm

      Where does it mention 1992 ?

  2. Paul says

    March 17, 2016 at 10:58 am

    Howard Carter discovered King Tut’s tomb in November 1922 !!!!!!! 70 years earlier than 1992 !!!!!!!!!!

    • Ana says

      March 17, 2016 at 11:08 pm

      I bet this is a typo & the editor missed it. Easy to do!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  3. David says

    March 17, 2016 at 11:37 am

    Dude, your mummy is so hot! 😛

  4. Antoon van Rijn says

    March 17, 2016 at 11:51 am

    Just to make sure: Are those chambers at the Giza pyramid or at the Valley of the Kings (Queens). Those two locations are about 500 miles apart. By the way; the temple of Queen Hatsheput is the most beautiful, impressive monument ever built. The view of the temple surrounded by the mountains is absolutely mind-boggling perfect.

  5. michael says

    March 17, 2016 at 12:52 pm

    Like all current day news people, accuracy and truth do not matter, just headlines. GET YOUR FACTS RIGHT. Is that to much to ask?

    • Jim says

      March 17, 2016 at 4:17 pm

      Apparently so, these days.

  6. Andrew Putnam says

    March 17, 2016 at 1:23 pm

    This is just inexcusable innacurate and shoddy journalism, really a Grade 2 primary school project would research more accurately than what we have in this shameful artical. Tutankhamun’s tomb is in the Valley of the Kings, not in a pyramid! And the 1992 botch claiming that was when Howard Carter discovered Tutankhamin’s tomb clearly demonstrates there is no fact checking or even the slightest understanding of history at Horn News- mess up from a cadet journalist, maybe, but a mess up on a scale like this can only mean th editor here is also completely clueless.

    • Jim says

      March 17, 2016 at 4:20 pm

      You need a spellchecker. It’s “article”, not “artical” as you wrote it.

      • MrsJohnson says

        March 17, 2016 at 5:49 pm

        Maybe Andrew was a bit upset when he misspelled the word.

    • Ana says

      March 17, 2016 at 11:05 pm

      Probably just a typo the editor missed!

GAM slot1

POPULAR

  • Cheers! Raucous soccer fans drank all of Boston’s beer during World Cup
  • Legendary “Robin Hood” tree dies after 1,200 years
  • 22-hour, non-stop flight!? This airline is making it happen
  • Gilgo Beach serial killer confession stuns victim’s families
  • Archaeologists discover another Stonehenge in rural England?
  • Mega pop star gets 5-year restraining order against alleged stalker
  • Luigi Mangione changes his defense to WHAT!?
  • Boxer Floyd “Money” Mayweather earns his nickname in bizarre Vegas arrest

GAM slot2

GAM slot3

GAM slot4

  • Sign Up Now
  • About Us
  • Social
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Join FREE

Copyright © 2026 | NewMarket Health Publishing, LLC