by Frank Holmes, reporter
Every election cycle, right after election day, Americans report voting machines didn’t count their votes.
Every election, the “experts” insist there’s no truth to it whatsoever.
They are wrong, a judge on state Supreme Court has said. In fact, the Supreme Court judge has ruled there’s more than more than enough evidence to hold a trial about how voting machines erased numerous votes in one of the Democrats’ toughest strongholds.
Judge Rachel Tanguay of the New York Supreme Court ruled in favor of a lawsuit targeting the unusual 2024 election results from Rockland County, part of the metropolitan area of New York City.
The case says voting machines deleted votes from the final vote total and wants an old fashioned hand count to settle the matter.
The proven vote erasures came in New York’s U.S. Senate race, and they all came from one candidate: third party candidate Diane Sare, an accomplished classical musician who conducts choirs, worked for 32 years with economist and perennial independent presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche. After he died in 2019, Sare became president of The LaRouche Organization.
Her passionate supporters knocked on doors, handed out flyers, and counted votes. But on election night, they noticed, something definitely didn’t add up.
In District 39, nine people immediately marched to the courthouse and signed sworn affidavits telling officials that they had voted for Sare—but the official vote tally records only five. In District 62, they had no trouble promptly finding five sworn Sare voters, but the machines reported only three.
“There is clear evidence that the Senate results are incorrect, and there are statistical indications that the presidential results are highly unlikely,” said Lulu Friesdat, founder and executive director of SMART Legislation. “If the results are incorrect, it is a violation of the constitutional rights of each person who voted in the 2024 Rockland County general election.”
Even aside from the voting irregularities the lawsuit can prove, the county’s election results seemed sketchy.
“Additionally, a statistician determined that the 2024 presidential election results were statistically highly unlikely in four of the five towns in Rockland County when compared with 2020 results,” reported the Associated Press.
Worse yet, this happened right after a company called Pro V&V made overhauls of the ES&S voting machines used there…and in half the country.
Some of Sare’s supporters wonder if she didn’t lose votes, because she angered some very powerful people.
Sare’s political allies repeatedly interrupted and embarrassed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.
In 2019, one of Sare’s voters went viral when she mocked AOC’s extreme environmentalist policies by posing as an even more radical environmentalist. “I love that you support the Green (New) Deal, but getting rid of fossil fuels is not going to solve the problem fast enough,” she said
“I think your next campaign slogan has to be this: We’ve got to start eating babies! We don’t have enough time. There’s too much CO₂!”
“All of you, you are a pollutant!” she told the audience, “Even if we would bomb Russia, we still have too many people.”
A flummoxed AOC had no idea how to respond. “We need to treat the climate crisis with the urgency that it does present,” said AOC, showing a Vulcan-like indifference to inhumanity of eating babies. “But I think we all need to understand that there are a lot of solutions that we have.”
In 2022, Sare’s backers went public for interrupting another AOC event.
“My friend @Noggatone and I confronted Congresswoman AOC,” wrote a Sare supporter in 2022. “I call her out for being a coward in the face of the party that will push us all into Nuclear war right now.”
My friend @Noggatone and I confronted Congresswoman @AOC on her support for Nuclear War and Ukrainian Nazis. I call her out for being a coward in the face of the party that will push us all into Nuclear war right now. Will she stand up like @TulsiGabbard and fight for peace? pic.twitter.com/aQiQvQSWIN
— Jose Vega — Vote Vega & Sare! (@JosBtrigga) October 13, 2022
That kicked off an avalanche. From then on, AOC couldn’t hold a public event without getting heckled—and not just by Sare’s crowd.
The everyday people of the Bronx—the people she supposedly represents—screamed at her, “All you care about is illegal aliens and their votes,” “Secure the border” and “You don’t care about your constituents!”
AOC’s presentation at a town hall in Queens was interrupted by attendees who shouted, “All you care about is illegal aliens and their votes,” “Secure the border” and “You don’t care about your constituents!” One even mentioned the $10k debit card program.pic.twitter.com/C4hv0I2MoR
— Julia 🇺🇸 (@Jules31415) February 23, 2024
At one point, AOC responded by trying on an embarrasingly over-the-top Hispanic accent.
Grab some popcorn & add extra butter. AOC was just humiliated at her own town hall meeting. It didn’t go her away and this is how she responded . pic.twitter.com/AZUF7lonxB
— Terrence K. Williams (@w_terrence) October 20, 2022
More to the point, Sare’s backers gave the same treatment to Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand at the College of Staten Island (CSI), Willowbook, in November 2022. “People are starving out here and you are feeding billions of dollars to Ukraine,” said the Sare supporter. “We are on the brink of a nuclear war.”
As it turns out, Sare’s opponent in last November’s Senate race was Gillibrand.
Did her supporters spike her old enemies’ vote count?
If so, it’s possible whoever rigged the system failed, because whole districts record zero votes for Gillibrand and Kamala Harris—something that’s virtually impossible…especially in a district where Democrats outnumber Republicans more than two to one: 97,663 registered Democrats in 2020 to only 48,241 Republicans.
The case will go forward—but the judge, who originally scheduled hearings for September 22, has suddenly announced the case won’t go to trial until early next year...just months ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Some tried to wave away the concerns. “Statistical irregularities in elections should always be investigated,” Costas Panagopoulos, a professor of political science at Northeastern University, told Newsweek. But the sources of such inconsistencies “can include error or miscalculation,” and “are not always nefarious.”
No. Not always.
Since “it does not appear that any of these inconsistencies would be sufficient to change the outcomes of any of the elections in question in New York state,” Panagopoulos continued, “there is not necessarily any need to invalidate any of these elections in these jurisdictions.”
But if the voting machines canceled votes, it may well have already invalidated the election outcomes, stripping the final results of potentially hundreds of voters.
Whatever happens in the lawsuit, Sare’s backers are not going to let it stop them from rattling Democrats who support the warfare/welfare policies of the Deep State. The latest video posted by Sare’s group asks its viewers to “Join Us to Call Out the Liars Their Lies Feed the War Frenzy.”