The Horn News

Proudly American, Fiercely Independent

Get in the loop!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Privacy Policy

One moment, please:

Processing your submission

  • Home
  • Politics
  • National News
  • Money
  • International
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • America Unleashed

This new NC bill will make liberals FURIOUS

May 8, 2017 By: Stephen Dietrich

  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • Post

Look out! North Carolina Republicans are driving a bill to protect motorists operating a vehicle during an unruly protest.

A motorist who strikes a protester blocking a public road in North Carolina would be immune from civil liability — under a bill before lawmakers — if the driver exercised “due care.”

In other words, lawmakers in North Carolina are warning liberal protesters to keep their highway shutdown nonsense out of their state!

Backers of the proposal advancing Wednesday in the North Carolina House said granting immunity would protect drivers traveling legally on a highway or street when a protester is injured trying to block their car.

In February, liberal protestors in Connecticut blocked an ambulance from getting to the hospital and then assaulted police who tried to move them — a stunt that nearly killed the critically ill patient.

Republican sponsor Rep. Justin Burr of Albemarle said during debate that drivers couldn’t deliberately run over protesters and avoid responsibility under the proposal receiving preliminary approval.

But he said it does protect individuals who are rightfully trying to drive on the road.

Lawmakers referred to demonstrators on Charlotte streets last September after a fatal shooting by a police officer. The protesters blocked both downtown Charlotte roads and interstate highways.

“We are trying the protect your average citizen who may be out there driving on the road and potentially have someone run out in front of their vehicle in the middle of the night who is trying to cause major disruptions on our roads,” Burr said. Preliminary approval followed on a 68-48 vote.

Opponents called the measure unnecessary; others worried aloud that the measure would bring needless attention to the state.

If the House grants it final approval, the measure still must pass the Senate.

 

 

The Associated Press contributed to this article. 

About the Author

Stephen Dietrich

Stephen is a U.S. Army veteran with over a decade of combined experience in political commentary, economics, and news.

GAM slot1

POPULAR

  • “Trump coin” is coming; here’s where you can get it
  • Unlikely foe teams up with WNBA star Caitlin Clark
  • Trump’s Truth Social undergoes surprising overhaul
  • Permanent daylight saving time gains momentum; but will it stick?
  • MLB’s Opening Day suddenly vanishes?
  • Savannah Guthrie targeted in major ‘Today’ show security breach?
  • Tragic cause of death revealed in famed “Jurassic Park” actor
  • 1 dead, 3 missing in mysterious accident off Alcatraz Island

GAM slot2

GAM slot3

GAM slot4

  • Sign Up Now
  • About Us
  • Social
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Join FREE

Copyright © 2026 | NewMarket Health Publishing, LLC