Judge Neil Gorsuch is set to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee early Monday, the first step for President Donald Trump’s nominee in the road to confirmation as a Justice of the Supreme Court.
Democrats are preparing to attack Gorsuch during the hearing — but critics say there’s little liberals can do to stop Gorsuch from being confirmed and giving conservatives back the majority in the nation’s highest court.
Get this arthritis pain fighter before it requires a prescription [sponsored]
Thirteen months after Antonin Scalia’s death created a vacancy on the Supreme Court, hearings are finally underway to replace him.
Gorsuch is a respected, highly credentialed and conservative member of the Denver-based 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. His nomination has been cheered by Republicans and is even praised by some left-leaning legal scholars. Democrats head into the hearings on Monday divided over how hard to fight him.
The nomination has been surprisingly low-key thus far in the mainstream media, which is largely distracted by Democrats’ Russian spying conspiracy theory. That will change this week as the hearings give Democratic senators a chance to attack Gorsuch.
The first day of the hearings Monday will feature opening statements from senators and Gorsuch himself. Questioning will begin on Tuesday, and votes in committee and on the Senate floor are expected early next month.
Guess Which Liberal News Story Was A Complete Distraction? [sponsored]
“Judge Gorsuch may act like a neutral, calm judge, but his record and his career clearly show that he harbors a right-wing, pro-corporate special interest agenda,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said at a recent news conference featuring sympathetic plaintiffs Gorsuch had ruled against. One was a truck driver who claimed he’d been fired for abandoning his truck when it broke down in the freezing cold.
Gorsuch’s supporters dispute such criticism and argue that the judge is exceptionally well-qualified by background and temperament, mild-mannered and down to earth, the author of lucid and well-reasoned opinions.
As for the frozen truck case, Gorsuch wrote a reasonable opinion that merely applied the law as it was, not as he might have wished it to be, said Leonard Leo, who is on leave as executive vice president of the Federalist Society to advise Trump on judicial nominations.
Worried about your next blood pressure test? Watch THIS… [sponsored]
“His jurisprudence is not about results,” Leo said.
Democrats have struggled with how to handle the Gorsuch nomination, especially since the nominee is hardly a fire-breathing bomb-thrower. Democrats are under intense pressure from angry liberal voters to resist Trump at every turn.
Several of the more liberal Senate Democrats have already announced plans to oppose Gorsuch and seek to block his nomination from coming to a final vote. But delay tactics by Democrats could lead McConnell to exercise procedural maneuvers of his own to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster threshold now in place for Supreme Court nominations, and with it any Democratic leverage to influence the next Supreme Court fight.
Republicans control the Senate 52-48. The filibuster rule when invoked requires 60 of the 100 votes to advance a bill or nomination, contrasted to the simple 51-vote majority that applies in most cases.
The Associated Press contributed to this article