Hillary Clinton spent $645,000 more a day than her opponent Donald Trump last month, but even with her $50 million campaign outlay, she has not been able to pull away from him in the race for the White House.
Clinton’s campaign had its most expensive month to date in August, eclipsing its previous monthly high by more than $12 million. And combined, Clinton and the national Democratic Party paid out $78 million in August, while Trump and the Republican National Committee spent about $47 million.
While both candidates are raising huge sums from donors, their lopsided spending lays bare the difference in the two major party presidential campaigns. Clinton is running a conventional operation featuring multimillion-dollar ad buys and expansive voter outreach. Trump has kept spending down by enjoying seemingly limitless free media coverage and outsourcing the guts of his voter contact duties to the Republican Party.
The spending disparity has also become a favored Trump boast.
“Our expenditures on advertising, our expenditures on people, our expenditures on everything are a tiny fraction. And yet we’re minimum tied,” Trump said Tuesday at a rally in Kenansville, North Carolina. “If you can spend less and be winning, that’s a positive thing, right?”
Josh Schwerin, a spokesman for the Clinton campaign, said Trump has been “derelict” in building a political operation that would help not only himself but down-ballot Republicans.
Four years ago, President Barack Obama and GOP nominee Mitt Romney each raised and spent about $1 billion, a formidable number that Clinton’s national finance director has also set as a benchmark.
Much of Clinton’s spending has been eaten up by advertising, which is costing her about $10 million per week. Through August, she blanketed 11 states with 35,714 broadcast television commercials to Trump’s 7,457 in five states, according to Kantar Media’s political ad data.
Clinton also has built a robust campaign team of 800 employees who cost a total of about $5 million last month. Even after an August hiring spree, Trump has a far smaller shop of about 130 employees and more than 100 consultants.
Among those consultants: Former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski. He parted ways with Trump in mid-June – and was immediately hired as a CNN contributor – but his Green Monster firm received a $20,000 payment for “strategy consulting” Aug. 11, the same amount it has regularly been paid for months.
The Trump campaign’s biggest expense for the month was more than $11 million to Giles-Parscale for digital consulting and online advertising. Like Trump, the Texas firm is new to politics.
The Clinton campaign’s August fundraising report shows increases in legal and polling expenses, which appear to reflect those firms’ billing cycles. The campaign spent about $450,000 on legal bills and almost $1.3 million on polling.
The presidential spending is even more lopsided after factoring in the main super PACs backing each candidate. While the campaigns must adhere to a $2,700-per-person, per-election donation limit, super political action committees can accept unlimited amounts of money.
Deep-pocketed Priorities USA spent $20.6 million last month, almost exclusively on Trump-bashing and Clinton-boosting TV, radio and digital. The group also replenished its war chest with a healthy $23.4 million haul.
Trump’s outside boosters have so far raised and spent much less money; for example, one group, Great America PAC, spent just $2.6 million in August. Some late help may be on the way: On Tuesday, a group called Future 45 said it has a $5 million commitment from billionaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson and $1 million from members of the Ricketts family to attack Clinton.
Clinton’s aides insist their investments will pay off on Election Day.
“Battleground states carry that name for a reason: They’re going to be close, from now until Election Day,” campaign manager Robby Mook wrote in a memo to supporters this week. “But we are going to win them because we’ve spent the past year building a superior ground game to communicate our message and turn our people out to vote.”
Yet if August finance reports are a guide, her heavy spending is only one piece of the puzzle.
The polls have tightened significantly since Clinton benefited from a post-convention bump in early August. Some surveys still show her slightly ahead, but others show an extremely tight race nationally and in key battleground states such as Florida and Ohio.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
liberty49 says
Yes, Hillary has been out-spending Trump 52-1 on ads in Florida alone and she is STILL losing. But don’t worry, Soros can afford to lose all that money!
Robert Early says
That’s okay. Our economy needs the money. LOL.
Trump 2016 !
Judy says
I’m so afraid that she’ll find some way to rig the voting so she will win, either by getting illegals to vote for her or tampering with the voting machines. I don’t trust her or her crooked family.
Donald Edwards says
goes to show how the spending will go in the WH, if Clinton gets in more taxes yet….
leugene says
that is the truth especially with paying for Bills women affairs
Marcia says
Who wants Bill he is not aging well at all. Must be old age is not his or Hillary’s friend. I guess the lying they have done is aging them fast. Like the fairy tale every time the boy lied his nose got longer. Well now it is the Clintons turn to see the lying on their faces
Old1 says
She’s your true Dem idiot. Nothing to run on but lies and more lies. So to try and get the vote what to do? Throw money at it and hope. Same as what’s going on in DC. Oboma and his gang of criminals have sent the deficit through the roof and gotten nothing done but bad deals with the enemy. Trump is running a lean machine with better results and they find fault. If we want to end the money train we need to get on the Trump train.
El Tejas says
That is the democrat way. If you want something done, throw a lot of money at it. If that doesn’t work. Throw more money at it. But where does all this money come from?
CJ says
Money isn’t everything
TexaninMO says
Where does all this money come from? One source is S-O-R-O-S.
Another is a bunch of Hollywood lefties. I don’t care what they do with their money, but it’s why I’d rather watch a movie with Bruce Willis, Jon Voight, James Woods (& several other conservatives) than support loonies like Scarlett Johansson, Cher, Leonardo DiCaprio, etc. I try to vote with my pocketbook, and can do without those RAGING libturds
Rob c says
You can’t spend your way to a new truth she will soon find that out.
Alan Humphries says
Right you can’t buy truth. Just think how good Hildabeast would have felt using this saying “The truth shall set you free” She might have aged slower but all her deception has come home to roost. She looks like death.
G10 says
$1 billion each. It didn’t used to cost that much to elect a US President.
Aren’t there better things in the country, or around the world, to spend $2 billion on?
Can’t they sort it out by an IQ test or flipping a coin?
Monkey idiots says
Thanks for saying that
I have been wondering
People who waste money will be beggars in the future