The felony prosecution of former Texas Gov. Rick Perry ended Wednesday when the state’s highest criminal court dismissed an abuse-of-power indictment that the Republican says hampered his short-lived 2016 presidential bid.
The 6-2 decision by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, which is dominated by elected Republican judges, frees Perry from a long-running criminal case that blemished the exit of one of the most powerful Texas governors in history and hung over his second failed run for the White House.
A grand jury in liberal Austin had indicted Perry in 2014 for vetoing funding for a public corruption unit that Republicans have long accused of wielding a partisan ax. The unit worked under Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg, an elected Democrat. Perry wanted her to resign after she was convicted of drunken driving.
Perry was accused of using his veto power to threaten a public official and overstepping his authority, but the judges ruled that courts can’t undermine the veto power of a governor.
“Come at the king, you best not miss,” Republican Judge David Newell wrote in his concurring opinion, quoting a popular line from the HBO series “The Wire.”
Perry has been campaigning for Republican presidential candidate Ted Cruz since becoming the first major GOP candidate to drop out of the race last year. Tony Buzbee, Perry’s attorney, said the former governor was pleased with the ruling.
“It was a bunch of foolishness from the beginning. I feel bad for him because he was put through this for no reason,” Buzbee said.
The court said veto power can’t be restricted by the courts and the prosecution of a veto “violates separations of powers.” A lower appeals court had dismissed the other charge, coercion by a public servant, in July.
Perry had rebuked the charges as a partisan attack from the start, calling it a “political witch hunt,” but the dismissal brought accusations of Republican judges doing a favor for a party stalwart. Texans for Public Justice, a left-leaning watchdog group that filed the original criminal complaint that led to the indictment, said Perry was handed a “gift” based on his stature.
Even a Republican judge who dissented in the ruling said the decision could leave the public with an uneasy perception that the system went out of its way to clear a famous politician with deep connections.
“The constant references to ‘Governor Perry’ could well be seen by the public as an inference that appellant’s position in life entitles him to special privileges and special treatment by this court that others might be denied,” wrote Republican Judge Cheryl Johnson, referring to how judges addressed Perry during deliberations.
Perry, the longest-serving governor in Texas history, made just one court appearance in the case and was defiant from the start — he went out for ice cream after turning himself in for booking at an Austin jail, and smiled wide for his mug shot.
Legal scholars across the political spectrum raised objections about the case. Still, the Republican judge overseeing it repeatedly refused to throw it out on constitutional grounds, prompting Perry’s appeals.
Michael McCrum, the special prosecutor who secured Perry’s indictment, maintained that the matter was built on evidence — not politics — and deserved to go to trial. He can appeal, but that would be a lengthy process. Combined, the original charges carried a potential maximum of 109 years in prison.
Despite his legal problems, Perry had formally announced he was running for president in June, hoping to convince GOP primary voters he deserved another chance after his 2012 bid was undone by a series of public gaffes. But his second campaign lasted barely three months, and he dropped out of the race in September.
The former governor spent more than $2 million on top defense lawyers. His latest White House campaign raised barely half that much in its first month, and Perry blamed the indictment for his sluggish fundraising. But polls showed he was badly trailing despite visits to Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. He was the first candidate to leave a GOP field jammed with 17 presidential hopefuls at the time.
The Associated Press contributed to this article.
The case was a sham from the get go same as the case against the makers of the PP video’s. This is the libtard way to try to shut people up. They the libtards belong in hell.
No party has taken more of our freedoms away than the eccentric repub party as it is today. They do nothing positive and are hate mungers. I am an independent. Waste our tax money on stupid investigations and shutting down the government when they dont get their way. I would like to see moderates if both oafties come into power to move our country in a positive way.
Mungers and oafties. Of COURSE you want to expand the scope, reach and control of government.