The Horn News

Proudly American, Fiercely Independent

Get in the loop!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Privacy Policy

One moment, please:

Processing your submission

  • Home
  • Politics
  • National News
  • Money
  • International
  • Health
  • Lifestyle
  • America Unleashed

Supreme Court just gave Joe Biden a big win over free speech

June 26, 2024 By: Darrian Johnson

  • Facebook
  • linkedin
  • Post

The Supreme Court has made a decision in a case about social media , the First Amendment, and the government, and said the Biden administration could push social media companies to remove certain posts.

Some Republican-led states, like Louisiana and Missouri, said the government was pressuring social media platforms to take down conservative viewpoints. They argued this was against the First Amendment, which protects free speech.

But the Supreme Court didn’t agree with these states, handing Biden a win over free speech. In a 6-3 vote, the justices said the states didn’t have the right to bring this case to court in the first place. This is called “standing” in legal terms.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the main opinion. She said the court couldn’t even look at the main arguments because the states didn’t have standing to sue.

Three justices – Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas – disagreed. They thought the states did have the right to bring the case and that the court should have looked at the main issues.

The Biden administration said they needed to be able to talk to social media companies about things like hate speech, national security, and public health. They were worried that if the court ruled against them, they wouldn’t be able to do this important work.

This case is part of a bigger debate about social media and free speech. The Supreme Court is dealing with several cases about this topic, including laws in Florida and Texas that affect what social media companies can take down.

Some people are disappointed that the court didn’t give more guidance on where to draw the line between the government reasonably asking social media companies to do things and pressuring them too much.

This decision doesn’t affect regular social media users or their posts. It’s more about how the government interacts with big social media companies.

The case shows how complicated issues of free speech can be in the age of social media, especially when it comes to the government’s role in dealing with online content.

About the Author

Darrian Johnson

Darrian Johnson is an experienced, conservative journalist who values facts (not feelings). Originally from Missouri, when he's not traveling for fly fishing, Darrian lives in Maryland.

GAM slot1

POPULAR

  • Boxer Floyd “Money” Mayweather earns his nickname in bizarre Vegas arrest
  • Ex-NHL star dead at 47 from mystery illness
  • Grammy-nominated rapper sentenced to 20 years in prison
  • Ageless! Soccer star Messi does unthinkable in sixth World Cup
  • Beloved country music star files for divorce
  • Fowl play? Viral mascot takes over World Cup
  • JD Vance’s liberal TV debut goes off the rails (shocker!)
  • UFC 250 will “never happen again” says…

GAM slot2

GAM slot3

GAM slot4

  • Sign Up Now
  • About Us
  • Social
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Advertise
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information
  • Join FREE

Copyright © 2026 | NewMarket Health Publishing, LLC