“On the Holmes Front” with Frank Holmes
This week, President Donald Trump made a huge move to shut down a political dirty trick that gives Democrats more representation in Congress than they could ever win from voters.
Using their unelected allies in the courts and the Deep State, the Democrats have rigged the game with rules that give them a dozen, possibly dozens, of unelected congressional seats—and now that they see it all coming to an end, they’re going to extreme lengths to keep it going.
The legalized cheating exploded into public view during oral arguments over Louisiana v. Callais in the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday.
The Trump administration’s lawyers argue that justices should repeal or reel in Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act (VRA)—a radical, racist, liberal protection racket that puts extra runs on the board for the Democrats before the game ever begins.
“Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate on the basis of race, color, or membership in one of the language minority,” according to the Justice Department…but in reality, it discriminates against Republican candidates and voters.
It all began decades after the civil rights revolution, when the Democrats realized they could use charges of “racism” to fuel their rise to power.
In 1986, they sued and won a Supreme Court decision saying that state legislatures actually had to draw congressional districts that grouped together minority voters, who overwhemingly vote Democrat.
The high court tried to reel this in seven years later—but the Democrats’ racial gerrymandering has gone on anyway, with rulings from judicial activists in lower courts ordering legislatures to create “minority” (read: Democrat) congressional districts.
Today, there are 148 majority-minority districts—more than a third of all seats in the House of Representatives—and many of them are gerrymandered so badly they don’t include any geographic interest or cohesive group except registered Democrats.
It’s so outrageous that the process gives Democrats between 12 and 19 congressional seats they would never win without Section 2 court orders, according to Politico.
“How many people just realized that Dems had as many as 20 extra seats based on years of unconstitutional race-based gerrymandering?” asked White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy Stephen Miller.
How many people just realized that Dems had as many as 20 extra seats based on years of unconstitutional race-based gerrymandering? https://t.co/htu4v2rFb0
— Stephen Miller (@StephenM) October 16, 2025
Losing this 50-year advantage as “a nightmare scenario” for Democrats, the website said.
The New York Times calls it “the Supreme Court case that could hand the House to the Republicans.”
The reason Democrats are “kicking and screaming here is they know it means potentially 19 seats are drawn like this, not to mention the five seats that are based on a fake algorithm during COVID to give them additional seats,” Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., told Laura Ingraham. “I think a lot of these institutional ways that the Democrats protected these majorities, using race as that cudgel, are probably going to go away and we’re going to have districts that again are compliant again with the constitutional principle that you shouldn’t discriminate based on race.”
No one doubts shifting between 12 and 19 seats from liberal Democrats to mostly Southern Republicans would make a huge change in the House of Representatives, where Republicans currently hold a six-vote majority (219 to 213). —and possibly destroy liberalism as we know it.
“Without Section 2, up to 30 percent of the Congressional Black Caucus and 11 percent of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus could be drawn out of their seats,” reported Politico, citing a report from the Soros-funded Black Voters Matter Fund and Stacey Abrams’ Fair Fight Action. (Stacey Abrams reportedly raided that group for millions of dollars, as The Horn reported.)
Losing these gerrymandered “problem-makers…would be a natural to de-radicalize the Democrat Party, something this country desperately needs,” Matt Howell of The Oversight Project told One America News host Matt Gaetz.
That’s why the most notorious liberals in America are making ridiculous arguments to keep things just the way they are.
One of them is Biden-appointed Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson—who said judges need to keep ordering legislatures to draw pro-Democrat congressional maps because of the Americans With Disabilities Act—since minorities are basically cripples. “Minorities…don’t have equal access to the voting system. They’re disabled,” said Jackson.
That offended a huge number of Americans and enraged Republicans—but Jackson was far from the only one reaching for radical arguments.
Ketanji Brown Jackson literally and directly compares black people not electing their preferred candidates to disabled people not being able to enter buildings
"They don't have equal access to the voting system. They're disabled." pic.twitter.com/aCJXeBwHTl
— Breitbart News (@BreitbartNews) October 15, 2025
During oral arguments, NAACP lawyer Janai Nelson said Louisiana had to comply with the order from an Obama-appointed judge to create a second pro-Democrat congressional district for Louisiana Democrat Cleo Fields—who won an all-black district in the 1990s and whose hometown newspaper describes his voting record as “very liberal.”
Nelson lied that “white Democrats were not voting for black candidates whether they were Democrats or not!”
“What? Didn’t Obama get elected twice in this country?” asked Laura Ingraham, a former clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas.
Soon, Nelson’s words ended up in the mouth of left-wing Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who complained, “Even…white Democrats won’t vote for black candidates.”
But Trump’s hand-picked legal team shut them down cold.
“If these were white Democrats, there’s no reason to think they would have a second district…That is literally the definition of race subordinating traditional principles,” Principal Deputy Solicitor General Hashim Mooppan ripped Sotomayor.
The Trump administration isn’t just restoring electoral balance and giving back voters their voice in elections. He’s actually ripping up “the alternate Constitution that the Civil Rights Act installed in this country” under ultra-liberal Democrats like Lyndon Johnson in the 1960s. “Under one Constitution, we say you can’t use race-based testing and all these other racial affirmative action policies. And then under the ‘Civil Rights Constitution,’ it says absolutely you have to. So, the Supreme Court is basically getting back to basics, saying, no, we have one Constitution in this country.”
It’s long past time to end the unfair advantage Democrats have used to shift American policy toward the far-Left for decades—and President Trump is on the case, from appointing the legal team making the case to appointing three Supreme Court justices hearing the case.
President Trump is telling unelected, black-robed dictators there will be “No Kings” giving Democrats seats from the bench anymore.